The Abstracts of Vol.2,2020
Releasing Time:10.09.2020Source:亚非发展研究所英文
International Order and Sino-US Strategic Competition
Zhu Feng
The most notable changes of international system are the rise of emerging market and developing countries and the change of the balance of power between China and major coun- tries in the world. In terms of the two countries strength position and global impact Sino-US strategic competition will not change international order in the short term. Even China keeps criticizing and challenging the trade bullyism practices of the US administration and its security and military actions in Indo-Pacific region it does not mean that China and US can not cooperate or have begun to compete for dominance in a transitional international order. Sino-US strategic competition will coexist with trade and necessary cooperation between the two countries. Sino-US strategic competition will affect the change of power ideas and behaviour and its development will to some extent decide the stability and change of international order. But its not the only determinant. The future of Sino-US strategic competition and international order will depend on the interactions of major countries in the world and their strategic decisions.
Reform for a Better World China and International System toward Coevolution
Wei Ling
Facing changes unprecedented in the past hundred years and entering into a new era China needs to promote coevolution between itself and the international system. Coevolution proposed by this paper is a process where an agent interacts proactively with the system it dwells in to promote mutual adjustment and accommodation and positive mutual feedback for common progress. During the process the greater impact the agent has on the system the greater agency it employs the more likely the coevolution is to be achieved. Agency as the core of the theory works through the agents practices for the resolution of structural con- flicts and the coevolution between the agent and the system. As China continues to rise in in- ternational system it needs to fully employ its agency and engage in both domestic and inter- national reform practices to promote coevolution between itself and the system. While improving domestic governance for sustainable development China needs to play a more active role in combating transnational threats and shouldering international responsibilities and further commit itself to the reform of international institutions the improvement of global gov- ernance and the progress of international cooperation and international system.
EU strategic autonomy and European version of Indo-Pacific strategy
Ge Jianhua
In order to improve international influence and realize newglobal security strategy EU has been strengthening its strategic initiative by building security forces to cope with the chal- lenges such as America first and Brexit . With the promotion of the Indo-Pacific geostrate- gic status EU and its member states continue to strengthen their ties with Indo-Pacific coun- tries striving to become a new strategic player in the region. Europes Indo-Pacific Strategy aims to intervene in the economic and security affairs in the region. On the one hand it tries to establish a multilateral free trade system in the region by signing bilateral or multilateral free trade agreements with the countries based on the Japan-Europe Trade Agreement and Japan- Europe relations. On the other hand with UK and France as EUs advance parties intervening in Indo-Pacific political order to maintain regional freedom openness prosperity and stabili- ty EU strives to become a stakeholder in the region to address traditional and non-traditional security issues and achieve strategic balance with China and the United States.
The Impact of Sino USTrade Frictions on Cross Strait Economy and the Countermeas- ures
Hu fang
According to the theoretical analysis of international trade Sino-US trade friction mainly originates from the gain and loss of interests in bilateral trade between China and the United States. The Sino US trade frictions initiated by the United States focus on the international supply chain trade. The way and method of the frictions are mainly the implementation of tar- iffs and other policy means and the purpose is to obtain huge economic benefits. Through trade and investment the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have formed closer economic relations especially the industrial chain trade and investment relations. The tariff and other means used by the United States in this Sino US trade friction will cause changes in cross strait economic relations especially in industrial chain trade and investment relations. In response to this Sino US trade friction the mainland and Taiwan have implemented policies and measures that are conducive to cross strait economic relations especially industrial chain trade and investment.
A Study on the Significance Conditions and Paths of Strengthening Maritime Non- traditional Security Cooperation between China and Japan
Zhang Xiaolei
The strategic thought of seapower is updated along with the age. Economic transforma- tion caused by reform and opening up is an important driving force for the development of Chinas seapower. From the beginning of the reform and opening up to 1985 the offshore defense strategy was formed. From 2008 when China participated in escort missions in the Indian Ocean and put forward the strategic idea of cooperation at sea. In 2015 China set the strategic goal of building a open seas protection navy. Chinas military strength and mari- time strategic activities have made continuous progress. Chinas export - oriented economic structure and overseas lifeline have been strengthened from scratch thus the development of power has been continuously stimulated and promoted. The strategy of Chinas seapower com- plies with and serves the national strategy and complies with the requirements of maritime power . Chinas seapower changes with the time. Strategic thoughts theories and practices are constantly formed. At the same time Chinas development of seapower needs to face such problems as gaming changes in the international economic pattern accelerating mili- tary modernization strengthening overseas pivots expanding military cooperation and con- trolling the development limit of maritime rights.
Balancing China Asymmetrically
An Analysis of Japans New Thinking on its Maritime Strategy
Gu Quan
The East Asian geopolitical situation has experienced a radical change in recent years. In this context the Japanese threat perception of China runs high. So does Tokyos desire to enhance US-Japan alliance and strengthen its own self-defense capability. All of these com- pel Japan to accelerate the reform of its maritime strategy from which the so-called new thinking of Balancing China asymmetrically emerges. Specifically it assumes US-China bipolarity and long-term competition has dominated the region and aims at maintaining US- Japan alliances command of the sea in the Western Pacific while preventing the disputes with China from escalating into a hot war. Denial Plus Control operational concept and Cost- Imposing deterrence concept are two approaches that Japan intends to employ to regain the high ground in its maritime rivalry with China. China is urgently required to rethink its own objective of maritime strategy reinforce strategic flexibility manage operational cost and consolidate its position to engage in a long-term maritime competition.
The Legal Argumentation of Philippine South China Sea Discourse Motivation Per- suasion and Deconstruction
Ye Shulan and Yu Huimin
In order to increase the bargaining leverage in bilateral negotiations with China and en- hance its discourse power the Philippines packaged its South China Sea discourse with in- ternational law. The Philippines calls the Nansha Islands the Kalayan Islands and puts forward such discourses as the discovery of free land the principle of preemption of ter- ra nullius contiguity or proximity the principle of prescription national security the principle of effective control . By resorting to logic emotion authority and reputation the Philippines has demonstrated its discourse in the South China Sea to obtain the initiative of discourse by citing facts cases and international law suing the tragic consciousness of small country as well as resorting to authoritative courts and figures. However there are some problems in Philippine legal argumentation such as out of context and wrong facts which need to be deconstructed. China should better combine historical evidence with mod- ern international legal argumentation.